Message 00033 | [Homepage] | [Navigation] | |
---|---|---|---|
Thread: rox2T00025 Message: 6/7 L4 | [In date index] | [In thread index] | |
[First in Thread] | [Last in Thread] | [Date Next] | [Date Prev] |
[Next in Thread] | [Prev in Thread] | [Next Thread] | [Prev Thread] |
Hi Graham and everybody, Graham Seaman wrote:
No, the link is right. Here's the license from it: <quote> Copyright (C) 2002 Richard StallmanVerbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium, provided this notice is preserved.</quote> It's a BSD-style license, which I (and rms ;-) think is more suitable for opinions - you can copy the article (or an audio version of it), or make it into a pdf or whatever. You can put it on a web-site.But you can't change it and attribute different words to the author than the ones he used (not without asking, anyway), and you can't deny that the author wrote it. You also have the right to take excerpts from it, since copyright law still allows this whatever the license.
I agree with Graham that for personal opinions this kind of license is more suited than the GPL or the GFDL. Perhaps we should leave it to the speakers which of kind of license (GPL, GFDL, BSD, RMS-style opinion license) they choose as long as Projekt Oekonux e.V. and erverybody else has *at least* the rights given above.
All code and documentation submitted by speakers should be Free, because code and documentation are not personal opinions.
Lutz ________________________________ http://www.oekonux-konferenz.de/
[English translation] | |||
Thread: rox2T00025 Message: 6/7 L4 | [In date index] | [In thread index] | |
---|---|---|---|
Message 00033 | [Homepage] | [Navigation] |